[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?
Andrew Welch wrote:
2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>:First, thanks to all for replies to my inquiry on this thread and also many thanks to Abel Braaksma for seeding this discussion. Yay, Andrew, I don't need any convincing of, as you say, "XSLT 2.0, it's the best" :-) What I was hoping for was more convincing that there are real gaps in the "market" for XSLT 2.0 engines and particularly in the C/C++ implementation space. Sadly, having inquired on various online forums and pursued some offline market research into the demand for a decent XSLT 2.0 implementation for the LAMP environment, I've been unable to positively identify such a real need as would be compelling enough to provoke the investment of time and money to develop and realize the same. The scale of difficulty involved in such a project (esp. XSLT 2.0 versus XSLT 1.0) certainly cannot be over-estimated. Nevertheless, with a little encouragement I'd like to be able to add a new XSLT 2.0 processor to Abel's list for 2010 and to complete such project which I've been slowly chipping away at for a few years now. Regards Justin Johansson
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|