Re: Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each

Mukul Gandhi wrote:

  Hi,

> I guess, xsl:call-template is retained in XSLT
2.0 due to
> backward compatibility with XSLT 1.

  Named templates and
functions are not the same beasts.  The first difference that come to my mind
is that the sequence ctor of a function is always evaluated in temporary
output state.

  But true, for some usages (a lot of usage, for a right
definition of "a lot") a function can be used instead of a named template.
Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/