[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [xslt performance for big xml files]
On Apr 25, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Florent Georges wrote:
I think only considering standard XQuery only is disingenuous, especially the way it is being presented by the vendors and people who write about it. Of all the real world applications deployed that use XQuery (I suppose I could be more specific and say as recommended by Liam, but maybe probably not necessary), how many do you think would work on more than one XQuery processor? I don't know, but from what I have seen posted on pertinent mailing lists and that XQuery as used/promoted by the XML DBs tend to favor their own extensions in documentation and lists (though there seems to be more caveats on the lists lately, though). ... Say the path/to/col contains the documents 1.xml, 2.xml and 3.xml cross XQuery processor, what does a collection('path/to/col')/* provide? -Rob
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|