[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: AltovaXML and fragment identifier
I wrote > , however a system is > allowed to reject any URI at all and if it chooses to reject all uri > with fragids passed to doc() or document() it can do that, but it should > raise [err:FODC0005]. which is false. It's true for doc() (which was what I was reading) but for document() the spec explictly says that the fragment identifier should be stripped off and used after retrieval. So document('test2009031701.xml#f1') is the same as document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1') or document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1') or an error, depending on various factors.... So, I don't thinl the system is correct if it raises an error for test2009031701.xml#f1 but not for test2009031701.xml. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|