[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPath 1 For Loop
2008/12/22 peter verhaar <peter.verhaar1@xxxxxxxxx>: >> You are far, far better off changing Xalan to Saxon... > > Yes, but that's not always an option (e.g. vendor support only xalan > at the moment) It's usually a far easier option than you think... The reasons for not using Saxon I usually come across are: - Never heard of it (despite heavy use of XSLT in the application) - Confusion with SAX processing - It's something new / yet another jar / general reluctance for change Depending on your setup, you should be able to: - swap in Saxon for Xalan without a problem - use both, but specifically use Saxon for the transforms under your control - or at worst some code changes when you use Xalan specifc features It's all really simple and often takes longer to convince people it's worthwhile than it does to actually do it. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|