RE: Fwd: DiffDog 2008 and XSLT 1.0

I suspect only one or two percent of readers of this list know what DiffDog
output looks like. If you want the other 98% to look at the problem, you
would be well advised to show a sample of the output (i.e. the input to your
transformation), and indicate what kind of report you want from it, and why
you think this is difficult to achieve using XSLT.

Also your title mentions XSLT 1.0. If you're using Altova DiffDog 2008 then
surely you also have access to an XSLT 2.0 processor, so why are you trying
to do it with your hands tied behind your back?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luke Stedman [mailto:luke.stedman@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 27 October 2008 09:55
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  Fwd: DiffDog 2008 and XSLT 1.0
> 
> Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening,
> 
> I've been asked to write some reports based on the DiffDog 
> 2008 XML output.
> 
> The preference is to have this done in XSL, so far no luck - 
> looking at it I can't seem to see a solid way of getting the 
> XML processed accurately using XSL.
> 
> Has anyone had any joy doing this or should I fall back to 
> doing it via Python and an XPath processor?
> 
> Cheers
> Luke