[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Benefits of xsl.sequence
> Whenever you think of xsl:function (or xsl:sequence) as source of > intermediate result, > that you won't output in the tree immediately, you notice that xsl:sequence > is more efficient: > > <xsl:function name="t:add" as="xs:integer"> > <xsl:param name="first" as="xs:integer"/> > <xsl:param name="second" as="xs:integer"/> > <xsl:sequence select="$first + $second"/> > </xsl:function/> Why is <xsl:sequence select="$first + $second"/> more efficient than <xsl:value-of select="$first + $second"/>? I can understand that math on atomic values ought to be more efficient than math on text nodes, but is the benefits something we can measure in any meaningful sense? Best regards, Jesper Tverskov
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|