[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem
I did understand you mean the first node, not the first attribute. Comprehension check: Does this at all contradict what Darcy wrote? I don't think it does...but just making sure. --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 11:17 AM I wrote: > //A[contains((B/@a[1]), 'foo')] but meant: //A[contains((B/@a)[1], 'foo')] ...but hopefully you got the idea! -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|