Re: which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collec

Play the video

Subject: Re: which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection()
From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:43:27 +0100

> I know we are only talking milliseconds here and what I'm currently working on
> is just over 100 docs. But when it comes down to the other projects I work on
> and it is now 10's of thousands if not 100's of thousands of docs then
> efficiency might come into play.

Won't memory come into play first - unless you use something like
saxon:discard-document() those 100s of thousands of docs will all be
held in memory....



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

Current Thread

Re: which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection(), (continued)
- Colin Adams - 26 Jun 2008 14:20:04 -0000
- Michael Kay - 26 Jun 2008 14:22:51 -0000
  - Mario Madunic - 26 Jun 2008 14:33:09 -0000
    - Andrew Welch - 26 Jun 2008 14:43:57 -0000 <=
    - Andrew Welch - 26 Jun 2008 14:45:37 -0000
    - Mario Madunic - 26 Jun 2008 15:03:08 -0000
    - Mario Madunic - 26 Jun 2008 15:02:08 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 26 Jun 2008 15:00:55 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: which is more effiecient , Mario Madunic	Thread	Re: which is more effiecient , Andrew Welch
RE: which is more effiecient , Mario Madunic	Date	Re: which is more effiecient , Andrew Welch
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >