Re: the future of xslt

hmm, actually I think this drifted off focus so I suppose I won't post
on the thread to the list anymore.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:18 PM, bryan rasmussen
<rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I realized what it was, basically having two words in a query and a
> single one in another, in cases where the search is something
> relatively non-mainstream - like my xsl-t xsl-fo example, means that
> Google won't have enough results in the query with multiple terms to
> make a useful comparison, it works if you do something like comparing
> the results for Obama Clinton, McCain then you can compare.
>
> Or in cases like python .Net, c# .Net
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=python+.Net%2C+c%23+.Net&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0
> you have just barely enough data in the Python .Net part to make a
> comparison.
>
> or http://www.google.com/trends?q=xml+xslt%2C+c%23+.Net&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=1
>
>
> better than nothing all the way I guess.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Bryan Rasmussen
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:47 AM, M. David Peterson
> <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:27:47 -0600, bryan rasmussen
>> <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think so, whenever I've looked I've had results of 0 for the
>>> grouped query, which doesn't make much sense.
>>
>> Yeah, which [expletive deleted]!  Seems like it would be an obvious and easy thing to do.
>>
>> --
>> /M:D
>>
>> M. David Peterson
>> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
>> Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx
>> Mobile: (206) 999-0588
>> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
>> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354