[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XProc or not XProc?

Subject: Re: XProc or not XProc?
From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:41:08 +0300
 Re: XProc or not XProc?
I'm sorry if this post opens a new thread, as I'm answering to my original post, which probably have no reference id assigned by a server.


To clarify my position, I shall ask another question:


Why xslt is not a ground for XProc?

In my opinion it is a natural sequence of events:
 a demand of pipelining, error handling, and so on, is appearing;
 to answer the the demand people design extensions to xslt (functions and
instructions);
 these extensions are discussed and standardized;
 XProc is appearing as something based on xslt.

Is XProc so really required?

Why should XProc be designed rather than extending (providing new api for)
xslt/xquery to perform pipeline processing?

Are xslt/xquery less declarative than XProc?

I wouldn't probably asked such questions if XProc were already well
established with implementations available.

-- Vladimir Nesterovsky

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.