[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT
Subject: Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:58:18 +0200
|
Colin Paul Adams schrieb:
"Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Scott> My reply is getting a little off-topic, but on the same
Scott> note, why haven't we seen a widely-used XML-based HTML
Scott> preprocessor language yet?
Pre-processors are just bad. (If you mean macro processors, that is.
If you mean transformation languages, such as XSLT, then you have the
answer to your own question.)
PHP, which stands for "Pretty Home Page", was surnamed "PHP HTML
Preprocessor" (a so-called recursive acronym, like GNU) when it was a
couple of years old, obviously in an effort to give it a more serious
appeal.
I thank that's what Scott was referring to, not macro processors.
As for XSLT in that role, it doesn't do SQL and send mail.
Michael Ludwig
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|