[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?
Michael Kay schrieb:
And the definitions of element-available() and function-available() don't say that much, so you can't rely on automatic conversion to just happen.Yes, although to be honest I would expect them to happen in this case (as apparently would implementors of other xslt systems.) The very first sentence of section 4 of XSLT 1.0 (Expressions) reads: XSLT uses the expression language defined by XPath [XPath]. -- http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Expressions The very first sentence of section 12 of XSLT 1.0 (Additional Functions) reads: This section describes XSLT-specific additions to the core XPath function library. -- http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#add-func Can we infer from this that section 3.2 of XPath 1.0, including rules for type conversion, applies to XSLT 1.0, including XSLT functions? Isn't this like the Letter and the Spirit of the Law? Michael Ludwig
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|