[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Difference in priority of node() and *

Subject: Re: Difference in priority of node() and *
From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:04:57 +0530
Re:  Difference in priority of node() and *
Thanks David for interesting perspective. Kindly see my few remarks below ...

On Feb 16, 2008 6:46 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> foo[x=1] is clearly more specific than foo[x &gt; 0] but they have the same
> default priority. node() and * having the same priority is no different.

foo[x=1] and foo[x &gt; 0] are semantically same. I certainly think,
that default priority of these patterns should be same. = and &gt; are
two relational operators, and I think, that this fact makes the
default priority of these two patterns same.

To my opinion, the case of * and node() is a bit different than the
foo[.. example you gave.

But certainly, the world is safe, and can live with the current status
of default priorities. And I won't argue much about it.

Mukul Gandhi

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.