Re: Compact XPath syntax

On Dec 26, 2007 8:02 PM, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Have you considered instead the following equivalent addresses:
>
>   //b/c
>   //f/c

This is also good ...

>
> >or //c (if you want to select all 'c' elements everywhere in the tree).
>
> Remembering, though, in all the above cases that "//" can be an
> expensive XPath address and should be used sparingly.

I agree strongly to this.

-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi