[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XSLTPROC performance
Hi First of all I introduce myself, I'm Giulio from Italy. I am required to write some extension function to a libxml compliant xslt processor. Actually we use the XSLTPROC that comes with the debian distribution. I've red the documentation and the faq and I've find that there are two xslt processor that I may use, XSLTPROC and XML::LibXSLT. The second choise will be easy for me, as I'm already able to register function in the perl way. I've tried to made it inside XSLTPROC, registering C modules, but I cant' get through it. The problem is that we made some benchmark (not very extensive benchmark indeed) and seems that the XML::LibXSLT solution is 20% -50% slower in execution than the XSLTPROC solution. Can anyone confirm or disconfirm this results? I've surf your mailing list archivie and the net but I can't found comparative benchlmark. If it is true, than I have to extend XSLTPROC (performance is the highest requirement), is there any tutorial how to do this (I've already red the one in the homepage od LIBXSLT and the one that comes with the source distribution). Is any other solution alternative to the two I've mentioned? The problem is that is about 6 years that XSLTPROC have been used and the new (?) processor must give the same results as XSLTPROC. Last question, the optimum will be to be able to use a java XSLT processor, but I must be sure that it is 100% compliant with the results of an XSLTPROC execution on the same input. Sorry for my english and thanks for helping me. Best regards. Giulio
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|