[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] [XSL] XSL Browser Integration
Robert Koberg wrote : Sorry if it looks like it, but as your second guess said, I'm not. I'm just trying to understand point of views of other people so that I can make up my mind with questions I have. May be there's a "killer reason" why my arguments are wrong, such as when I asked if it would be possible to read "previous iteration results" and one of you pointed that loops in XSL are to be imagined as running in parallel, so "previous iteration" has little meaning! I have in mind several use-case where XSL gives you a *BIG *bonus when used client-side compared to other existent technos, but these use-case would be irrelevant if they were an obvious reason why XSL should be mostly server-side... And I don't want to bother you with irrelevant things! So let's summarize opinions & main reasons: Scott Trenda says Mostly server-side (unreliable on client-side) Robert Koberg says Both sides (+ must use other techno, so better browser integration is low priority) David Peterson says Both (+ needs better browser integration) Alain Benedetti says Both (+ browser integration is high priority)
Alain BENEDETTI
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|