Re: Taking flat XML and parsing into multi level nexte

>> Instead of Muenchian, if you really *have* to stick to XSLT 1.0,
>   ^^^^^^^^
>
> The Muenchian method is defined and used with XSLT 1.0, why users who
> have to stick to XSLT 1.0 should not use it?
>

In this particular case, I think that the tree-walking algorithm suits better
than the Muenchian grouping method with keys (which may yield an interesting
discussion on its own). Someone did come up with a good tree walking solution,
not sure if a similar thing with Muenchian would be equally easy/hard (I'll
leave the comparison of the two for this case to others).



>
> P.S.
> Abel, I tried to reach you via email, probably do not have your
> correct email address.

I see it now. It got filed in the xsl archive instead in my normal inbox.
Answer underway ;)

Cheers,
-- Abel Braaksma