[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Calculating cumulative values - another call for h
On 8/30/07, Simon Shutter <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry - I should have been more clear. Could one use something like > count(ancestor::set) instead? Probably not the thing to use... but its hard to suggest what to do instead just from that sentence.... Just changing "n" to "3" is enough to make it work with your sample input - if you're suggesting that set/@id isn't like it is in your sample and you're having problems adapting the transform to work with your actual input then post a more representative sample. -- http://andrewjwelch.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|