Re: Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re XHTML

Play the video

Subject: Re: Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re XHTML html validation
From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:42:00 -0500

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:25:15 -0500, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Perhaps it is worthwhile to create a little list with pros and cons for people that are new to the subject so that anyone can decide for his/her own situation. I understand that you know pretty much of this type of transformation invocation, maybe you can help improving a Wiki article on this subject (not yet there).

Not complete, I'm sure, but...

Cons:

- no caching of the processor object - when using XHR (XMLHttpRequest), the transform will not be invoked. You will have to parse the DOM to find the PI and apply the transform from JS.

Pros:

- simple
- works in almost every browser (just not in XHR)

best,
-Rob

Current Thread

Re: Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re XHTML html validation, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Using xsl:output in brows, Abel Braaksma	Thread	Re: Using xsl:output in brows, Robert Koberg
Re: Using xsl:output in brows, Abel Braaksma	Date	Re: Using xsl:output in brows, Robert Koberg
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >