= vs. eq / was: Re: Getting WordprocessingML p

Play the video

Subject: = vs. eq / was: Re: Getting WordprocessingML p style
From: Yves Forkl <Y.Forkl@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:41:34 +0100

Sorry when my phrase "I suggest using '=' instead of 'eq'" would seem like a general claim, I just forgot to add "in this case".

My sole intent was to propose using "=" in the case described, i.e. when trying to test for membership of a string in a sequence. (I first was looking for an algorithmic solution, but then happily discovered that all I had to do was to use the general comparison provided by "=". Must have missed something at the time when I was learning XSLT 1.0...).

But I am glad having read your insights into the nature of these operators.

Yves

Current Thread

Re: Getting WordprocessingML p style, (continued)
- David Carlisle - 1 Feb 2007 10:23:14 -0000
  - Yves Forkl - 2 Feb 2007 13:10:47 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 2 Feb 2007 14:54:41 -0000
    - Florent Georges - 2 Feb 2007 15:33:37 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Getting WordprocessingML , David Carlisle	Thread	Re: Problem with Positional G, David Carlisle
Re: Saxon auto-recognition of, Abel Braaksma	Date	Re: Microsoft XML Team blog: , M. David Peterson
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >