[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT 2.0 has arrived
Colin Adams wrote:
And many others. It is extremely clean and clear. If only Bertrand Meyer were able to attract more people into using Eiffel....
Reading this, I really haven't the faintest idea why there are still people around there using xsltproc. Working around bugs and non-compliance issues. Or, well, maybe that's it: like the experience I had with XML Spy. Using it, you think "this is the way to do it". Using your wrong non compliant stylesheets with a compliant processor will give you errors, and you go "ah, you see? XML Spy is better! It does not give me errors". Whereas you should say: "oops, I thought I coded correctly, but instead, I did not. Now I can finally fix my erroneous stylesheets". Just do fn:replace($text, 'XML Spy', 'xsltproc') on the above text with an XSLT 2 compliant processor. My reason for not attempting to really test Gestalt is: unparsed-text(). We have literally thousands of internationalized text files that are parsed into XML using xsl:analyze-string and it really rocks (though it is much slower than doing the same in Perl, it is also much cleaner). Isn't it possible to use the excellent IBM ICU libraries for the encodings from within Gestalt (or Eiffel)? Then you support 500+ encodings in one go. It is there in C and Java and it is open source. Cheers! -- Abel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|