[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [XSLT 2.0] Checking that an element's value has th
bryan rasmussen wrote: > On 10/17/06, Florent Georges wrote: > > I don't say it is not correct to use matches() to check > > the lexical representation of a value, in order to try > > to deduce some information about its type. > I was pointing out that while Roger may have phrased it > that way the reference to schematron seems to indicate > that what he actually means is that with matches he can > constrain the value. Maybe. > It is perhaps an arrogant assumption > on my point but I think he means that he thought that > matches, using Unicode Regex would more closely and easily > match the requirements expressed in the schema because of > basically using the same constraint 0-9. I can't see how using matches() can "more closely and easily match the requirements expressed in the schema" than a schema validation itself. And as Mike pointed out, what about " 1 "? > > But then you have to be aware you'll not get the type, > > you'll get guesses. > As stated earlier I don't believe he wants to get the > type, he wants to constrain the value, and as for me I am > not at all interested in the type. Maybe. Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Demandez ` ceux qui savent sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|