[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: more elegant way of doing this? (very simple)
unless you really need to always use a node test AContribution rather than name()='AContribution' It's namespace aware and likely more efficient. Are you using xsl 1 or 2? xpath 1: sum(Records/Record/*[self::AContribution|self::BContribution|self::CContribution][number()=number()]) xpath2 you can do the same, or a bit more simply: sum(Records/Record/(AContribution|BContribution|CContribution)[number()=number()]) David
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|