Re: A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated

"Jack" == MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jack> Colin Paul Adams wrote:

"Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

In principle, you could use XSLT with a different expression language from XPath - this just happens to be non-conformant.

Michael> It's not non-conformant if it it's done using the Michael>
Michael>

extensibility features of the language:

Michael> <YPath:value-of select="ypath-expression"/>

Good point. I hope there's no demand for it though :-)

Jack> Really??? I find XSLT itself reasonably lucid; it's XPath Jack>
that I find obscure and hard-to-remember.

Really. Speaking as an implementor, I don't want to have to implement
 another expression language.

But I don't find XPath obscure at all.

--
Jack.