[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: amp symbols
At 09:20 AM 7/3/2006, it was written:
On 7/3/06, Chad Chelius <cchelius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:David, I have a similar situation. The people that I am sending XML files to, require that entities be used for certain characters. The "custom parser" might indeed be wetware engines, some of them running very old operating systems, difficult to maintain and even more difficult to upgrade. For whatever reason, these components frequently expect that data be expressed in idiosyncratic forms, such as "& copy;" for "&# 162;", more amenable to their peculiar processing algorithms. Yet because these "human users" are often capable of performing operations beyond the capabilities of even the most advanced digital applications, they are often regarded as indispensable parts of the system, and interfaces are designed around them. If the target system doesn't present this complication then there's a lot less reason to output entities. And even if it does ... Unicode and good editing software were supposed to do away with such quaint ideas as having people inspect and modify source code in raw form. Ha. Regards, Wendell
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|