[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Strict sequential identity rule?
OK, Dimitre, I give up. I know you've got a rabbit up your sleeve, and I can't ferret it out. I was thinking the catch might be that a node produced by copying can never be "identical" to the original, but I can't imagine that's what you had in mind. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitre Novatchev [mailto:dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 21 September 2005 13:48 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Strict sequential identity rule? > > Hi, > I think that trying to answer the following question can be > interesting and > useful for the members of our community. > > Is the following statement true or false: > > "The transformation below is an identity transformation": > > <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> > <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes"/> > <xsl:template match="@* | node()"> > <xsl:copy> > <xsl:apply-templates select="@*"/> > <xsl:apply-templates select="node()[1]"/> > </xsl:copy> > <xsl:apply-templates > select="following-sibling::node()[1]"/> > </xsl:template> > </xsl:stylesheet> > > > -- > Cheers, > Dimitre Novatchev > --------------------------------------- > Getting caught is the mother of invention.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|