[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: User defined SAX ContentHandler
My opinions:
1. First of all, one minor correction: SAX is not a W3C standard. 2. I don't think this is a practical idea, because as someone has mentioned, it is going to involve too much of reflection overheads and messy code generations. But, even if we do that, what are we going to achieve by that? If your idea is to generate strongly typed application specific Xml datastructure for an Xml instance, you can take a look at JAXB. Thanks, Prakash Ramkumar Menon wrote: Hi All,
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|