Re: Frustrated with xxx:node-set

Sorry Karl,

I have misled you --  transforming with exMsxsl still produces the
wrong result  --- I took

<foobar_summary>  (which comes with content)

for

<summary_for_foo>


So, you have to either modify your code to avoid this bug or start
using MSXML3 or another XSLT processor.


Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev




On 6/2/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not trying to access the stylesheeet as you suggested, using exmsxl
> command line interface to do so.
>
> I have had success using msxsl and specifying ver. 3.0 which returns
> the output I am expecting, the problem there is that 3.0 does not
> offer support for the ms function format-date; no biggy, I don't mind
> losing that feature.
>
> Thanks..
>
> Dimitre, any more ideas on the exMsxsl dilemna I am having?
>
> On 6/1/05, Bovy, Stephen J <STEPHEN.Bovy@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Are you trying too access the style sheet within your xml doc
> > with a processing instruction ???
> >
> > <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"
> >  href="'test.xsl" ?>
> >
> > If so you are stuck with MSXML3   ....
> >
> > Also the most current version of MSXML3 must be installed in replace
> > mode ..
> >
> > MSXML4 or msxml5 delivered with office 2003 can only be accessed thru
> > script code which really [expletive deleted].
> >
> > I wish microsoft would provide a patch to fix this.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karl Stubsjoen [mailto:kstubs@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:33 PM
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re:  Frustrated with xxx:node-set
> >
> > Uggg... just modified the xslt decleration to:
> >
> > <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
> > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> >        xmlns:fx="http://exslt.org/common">
> >
> > ..and still miss-behaving : (
> >
> > Oddly enough, works if I change the 4.0 to 3.0 like this:
> > exmsxsl foobar.xml get_foobar.xsl -o result.xml -u '3.0*ex'
> >
> > So wondering if I am still hooked into Microsoft's MSXML Lib somehow.
> >
> >
> > On 6/1/05, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 6/2/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hi Dimitre, thanks for the tips!  Just tested your exMSXSL parser
> > with:
> > > > exmsxsl foobar.xml get_foobar.xsl -o result.xml -u '4.0*ex'
> > > >
> > > > But seems to have produced the same buggy response as msxm4.  Could
> > > > I have done something wrong on install?
> > >
> > > You have to modify your xslt code: switch from the microsoft namespace
> > to:
> > >
> > >  "http://exslt.org/common"
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dimitre Novatchev.
> > >
> > > > (I dropped the exMsxsl.exe file
> > > > in my Window 32 directory -- after running the setup.exe file)