[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:

Subject: Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:38:22 +1000
Re:  Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
On 13 May 2005 05:36:24 +0100, Colin Paul Adams
<colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>    Dimitre> Or be prepared for all kinds of a nasty surprise
>    Dimitre> following the fact that the value of
>
>    Dimitre>        my:f($x) is my:f($x)
>
>    Dimitre> is generally not guaranteed to be true()
>
> It isn't, as if either function returns an atomic sequence, you get a
> type error.


Sure, I must have added that my:f() is of type node()*.

Cheers,
Dimitre

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.