[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:

Subject: Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 May 2005 11:00:53 +0100
Re:  Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Dimitre> I was talking not about "functions" but about
    Dimitre> xsl:function

    Dimitre> Does it make a difference now?

    Colin> I don't see it.  You originally said:

    Colin> "xsl:function -s with side effects should not have been
    Colin> allowed -- in the first place."

    Colin> But that is not sufficient to guarentee that f($x) is f($x)
    Colin> always returns true().

    Colin> Oh yes it is!

Oh no it isn't!
I've degenerated into pantomime.
I shall now go for a walk, until my head is clear.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.