[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
> The debate with memo-function would be about whether it actually has any > semantics, or is merely a performance hint. Could a conformant processor > ignore it? What is the effect on a "creative" function, one that constructs > new nodes each time it is called? xsl:function -s with side effects should not have been allowed -- in the first place. So it is not only a nice wish to think about memoisation, but probably a pressing need to clean up the spec from functions with side effects. Or be prepared for all kinds of a nasty surprise following the fact that the value of my:f($x) is my:f($x) is generally not guaranteed to be true() Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|