[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re:
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Dimitre> Or be prepared for all kinds of a nasty surprise Dimitre> following the fact that the value of >> Dimitre> my:f($x) is my:f($x) >> Dimitre> is generally not guaranteed to be true() >> It isn't, as if either function returns an atomic sequence, >> you get a type error. Dimitre> Sure, I must have added that my:f() is of type node()*. Not really. My comment was off the ball. Since $x may raise an error anyway. To be pedantic, my:f($x) is my:f($x) should always evaluate to true() in the absence of errors. But that can be taken as read. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|