[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: following-sibling and xsl:sort
> > Me too. Turing completeness is not the same as closure over > the data model. > > To take an obvious example, there is no way of creating a > result tree that > > contains an unparsed entity, even though the data model > allows unparsed > > entities to exist. > > Closure only implies that you never create anything not in > the set; not > that you can create everything in the set. Thanks for the correction, you're right of course. Is there a term for what I was trying to express: "complete coverage", perhaps? Michael Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|