[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: following-sibling and xsl:sort
On 4/28/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is the obvious (and only) solution to use xxx:node-set against > transformed / sorted XML? The answer follows from the fact that XSLT is Turing-complete. Therefore, any problem, which has solution using the xxx:node-set() extension function should have a solution without using it. In the case of grouping and then sorting, one such pure XSLT 1.0 solution can be found at: http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200311/msg00659.html Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|