Cart
|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Is there a reason for not using XSLT 2.0 as a default
 I have a question that calls for informed opinion: is there a reason for not using xslt 2.0 for most processing tasks? I'm thinking especially privatish, and pre-processed things rather than on-the-fly commercial applications. The standard is now pretty stable, correct? and the processors seems to be working well. Saxon 8b-3 is very good, and since Saxon 6.5.3 has a bug that seems to stop it writing properly in Service pack two XP machines, it may be a good time to switch anyway. No doubt a trivial question, but I'd be interested in hearing what people think. I'm engaged in a couple of new project involving xslt where the question of 1.0 or 2.0 is real. -dan -- Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD Associate Professor of English University of Lethbridge Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4 Tel. (403) 329-2377 Fax. (403) 382-7191 E-mail <daniel.odonnell@xxxxxxxx> Home Page <http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/> The Digital Medievalist Project: <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/> 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
