[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

[no subject]

[no subject]
This prompts a few other questions I've had for some time:

When a sequence is passed as a parameter, what is actually passed --
its copy or a reference to the sequence?

If there's actually such thing as a reference to a sequence, then why
should calculating the hash key of this reference take longer than
scanning through many items until the last (which may be thousands of
items away)?

Are subsequences shared so that when an item is added at either end
the original sequence is not copied, but a reference to itself is
used?

I know the general answer about this being implementation-dependent,
however Saxon is the only real XSLT 2.0 processor I have at this
moment. I also believe that understanding the principles behind the
answers will help XSLT programmers write better, more efficient XSLT
code units.

Cheers,
Dimitre.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.