Re: following-sibling problem

> I need to do  some grouping? 
yes you are doing the classic example of "positionl grouping" so since
you are using 2.0 you could use teh grouping constructs.

However I didn't understand your comment
>  How, for exasmple, 
>  would I also handle a situation where I have:
> 
> 	bullet 1a
> 		bullet 2a
> 		bullet 2b
> 	bullet 1b
> 		bullet 2c
> 		bullet 2d

as I thought that was exactly the case described earlier.

each level 1 element checks if the immediately following thing is a
level 2 and if it is it starts a list and then processes that level 2.
a level 2 node has to process itself then process any immediately
following level 2 so the end result is that any consecutive sequence of
level 2s ends up in the list started on the level 1

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________