[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

copy vs. copy-of performance in xsltproc

Subject: copy vs. copy-of performance in xsltproc
From: "Werner, Wolfgang" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:44:57 +0200
xsltproc performance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

has any of you experience regarding the performance of copy compared to
copy-of in xsltproc?
Right now I'm copying some parts of the source tree completly while
filtering some other parts.
I use the following template:

~  <xsl:template match="/ | @* | node()">
~    <xsl:copy>
~      <xsl:apply-templates select="@* | node()"/>
~    </xsl:copy>
~  </xsl:template>

My question is, if I want to copy a complete element, is it faster to use

~  <xsl:template match='dontfilterme'>
~    <xsl:copy-of select='.'/>
~  </xsl:template>

or the default template above?
How much does the complexity of the copied element influence the speed?

Any pointers appreciated,
Wolfgang
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBYl8JqjaicDyx8o8RAtBrAJ91d6Xl6aWTPlx237bBzlsvAP4/ZgCfYla/
UbqeRlsJgfxzdOZ9jLmDE4U=
=/bpn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.