[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] copy vs. copy-of performance in xsltproc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, has any of you experience regarding the performance of copy compared to copy-of in xsltproc? Right now I'm copying some parts of the source tree completly while filtering some other parts. I use the following template: ~ <xsl:template match="/ | @* | node()"> ~ <xsl:copy> ~ <xsl:apply-templates select="@* | node()"/> ~ </xsl:copy> ~ </xsl:template> My question is, if I want to copy a complete element, is it faster to use ~ <xsl:template match='dontfilterme'> ~ <xsl:copy-of select='.'/> ~ </xsl:template> or the default template above? How much does the complexity of the copied element influence the speed? Any pointers appreciated, Wolfgang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBYl8JqjaicDyx8o8RAtBrAJ91d6Xl6aWTPlx237bBzlsvAP4/ZgCfYla/ UbqeRlsJgfxzdOZ9jLmDE4U= =/bpn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|