RE: Advise wanted.

I've no idea which version of LotusXSL you are using or what its current
status is, but if you are considering switching for performance reasons,
then Xalan is not a particularly good choice. Among the Java processors,
Saxon is often 3-5 times faster than Xalan.

Michael Kay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: shishir.srivastava@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:shishir.srivastava@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 06 January 1999 21:58
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  Advise wanted.
> 
> Hi,
> I have been using LotusXSL(supplied along with Domino Release 
> 5) parser to
> transform xml to HTML.
> It works fine.
> But somewhere i came acroos that instead, if i use the latest 
> rel of Xalan
> (since xalan has eventually grown a lot since IBM donated it 
> to Apache ),
> i could get a significant performance benefit.
> Any comments ,links or pointer would be great help.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> ___________________________
> Shishir Srivastava
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *****************************************************************
> The addressee's email address has changed to
> firstname.lastname@ sgcib.com. You may want to update your
> personal address book. Please see http://www.sgcib.com for more
> information.
> 
> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential
> and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorised use or
> dissemination is prohibited.E-mails are susceptible to alteration.
> Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
> shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
> *****************************************************************
> 
> 
> --+------------------------------------------------------------------
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --+--
> 
>