[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: MSXML and unwanted entity output
So how can I get a bit of javascript that is full of &&'s and <'s to output as &&'s and <'s Do I have to use something like (Example fromn FAQ) for every instance of these characters in the Javascript?: <xsl:value-of select="'<BR/>'" disable-output-escaping="yes"/> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:20:54 +0100, "Alex Scott" <fastidious007@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Ok, > > So are you saying that this can't be change in the XSL as whatever > characters I use it will not make any difference to the output, > and this is therefore a problem (Supposedly further down the line)in the > XML parser? > --- > Alex. > > On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:05:51 +0100, "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > > > > > <![CDATA[&&]]> > > > Will out put as an entity: > > > && > > > > > > > > > Does this look like a problem in the output type, or is there > > > a way I can > > > alter the XSLT so that I can get > > > the HTML returned as the same stuff I put in i.e. > > > && or < > > > > This is a FAQ. > > > > An XSLT transformation parses your source XML, creates a tree > > representation > > of the source, transforms it, and then serializes the result tree. > > Lexical > > details of the source XML, for example whether attributes use single > > quotes > > or double quotes, are lost in this process. The difference between > > <![CDATA[&&]]> and && is one of these lexical details. > > > > You would want the test "contains(., '&')" to work regardless how the > > ampersand was written in the source, surely? > > > > Michael Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|