[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: measuring bulk performance & turn around times of
True. I believe that would be the simple way. Add 'time' blocks and measure. But, I was interested in more XSL centric measurements if any, since XSL does not process XSL code in a top to bottom way like normal code. In essence, this will only allow me to measure "total" end to end time and will not allow me to get other metrics that might be smaller than the "complete" time. Of course, I will look into the things suggested by everyone here. ____________________________________________________________ Abhishek Sanwal HP - Houston Campus -----Original Message----- From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort [mailto:pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:02 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: measuring bulk performance & turn around times of XSL transformations? ideas for: XML to XML, XML to HTML, XML to FO (then to PDF) No, never used nxslt - I see it is a command line utility using .NET XslTransform class - interesting! Of course, N/A means that it's not available or just not implemented. Anyway, you could contact XSelerator support about that. Another option would be to just get the current system time instance when you start a transformation, and measure time afterwards, in your application. What's your take on it? <prs/> -----Original Message----- From: Kenny Akridge [mailto:kenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 12:55 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: measuring bulk performance & turn around times of XSL transformations? ideas for: XML to XML, XML to HTML, XML to FO (then to PDF) Pieter, Do you have nxslt running in Xselerator? If so, have you been able to get the performance information using it? I have been unable to so far. I always get N/A. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort [mailto:pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 1:50 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: measuring bulk performance & turn around times of XSL transformations? ideas for: XML to XML, XML to HTML, XML to FO (then to PDF) Hi Abhishek, You could start searching the archives using the word 'performance'. Also check http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect4/N9883.html. > How have you (if ever) measured or tried to measure the performance of > the transformations? Utilities like XSelerator show you the time needed to do when doing XML parse, XSL parse, and XSL Transformation time. Very useful. I used various techniques to process XML and compared those times using MSXML 4.0 (you can use other processors by simply adding them to the Environmental options). I have been doing some performance testing, but only on two processors sofar (MSXML 4.0 and .NET's XslTransform). Don't know which you're using? Cheers, <prs/> http://www.pietsieg.com http://www.pietsieg.com/dotnetnuke Contributor on www.ASPToday.com Co-author on "Professional ASP.NET XML with C#", July 2002 by Wrox Press
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|