[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: measuring bulk performance & turn around times of

Subject: RE: measuring bulk performance & turn around times of XSL t ransformations? ideas for: XML to XML, XML to HTML, XML to FO (then to P D F)
From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:17:44 -0500
RE:  measuring bulk performance & turn around times of
Is that paper still available, Kevin? 

<prs/>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kielen, Agnes [mailto:Agnes.Kielen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:58 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE:  measuring bulk performance & turn around times of XSL t
ransformations? ideas for: XML to XML, XML to HTML, XML to FO (then to PD F)

December last year I've downloaded a complete paper about XSLT performance
from Sarvega. Called SarvegaXSLTBenchmarkStudy2.pdf

Cheers,
Agnes

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Jones [mailto:kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: dinsdag 27 april 2004 23:01
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  measuring bulk performance & turn around times of XSL t
ransformations? ideas for: XML to XML, XML to HTML, XML to FO (then to PD F)


On Tuesday 27 April 2004 6:50 pm, you wrote:
>
> Utilities like XSelerator show you the time needed to do when doing 
> XML parse, XSL parse, and XSL Transformation time. Very useful. I used 
> various techniques to process XML and compared those times using MSXML 
> 4.0 (you can use other processors by simply adding them to the
Environmental options).

I would be very careful about only doing that. There are a lot of startup
costs in most XSLT processors that cause problems with one shots tests. You
almost certainly need to use a custom driver that matches how you would like
to use the processors to get accurate figures. 

If its WIN32 only, the Microsoft recommendation used to be carry on using
MSXML (via COM) as the .NET XSLT was still under development. Of the
publicly available processors MSXML always comes very high up the
benchmarks. If you want more performance you need to look at the companies
that specialize in XML appliances and/or do some code tuning.

I have spent a fair amount of time comparing XSLT processor performance so
feel free to ask some detailed questions. I also have access to pretty much
the full range of processors if there is some standalone bit of XSLT you are
interested in getting figures for.

Kev
Sarvega Inc.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.