[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge

Subject: RE: Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge
From: Michael Müller-Hillebrand <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:37:27 +0100
RE:  Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge
On 18.03.2004 (10:20 Uhr +0000), Andrew Welch wrote:

>Heres a potential solution...

[...]

>This is linear, so hopefully you can use it. Please post back any
>comments/improvements.

Andrew,

That is great. I can't even see a difference in performance between my 4 and 256 row test tables! It is always below two seconds!

I removed the code that came from my width-collecting requirement and will post the rest as a general table normalization stylesheet in a different post for easier retrieval ("Table Normalization").

Now with 2 seconds (XSL) against 32 seconds (Omnimark) it looks like a clear win.

Thanks a lot! I learned a lot, too!

- Michael

-- 
_____________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Ing. Michael M|ller-Hillebrand
                                     
"Mehr Effizienz f|r Wissensarbeiter" --> http://cap-studio.de

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.