[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT vs Perl
> > > Xslt has been designed as a language with a purpose; It was designed as a language with a purpose. > perl has neither of these attributes, hence perl's chaotic nature and > unmaintainabilty. Same about perl and almost the same purpose. What about maintainability, look at CPAN. Can XSLT dream about this volume of maintainable and usable code? > But I > think, as well, it's a matter of apples and pears. An XSLT application > would, IMO, also include Java or some other language. Perl fills in any gap > it can gets it's paws on, A perl application typically includes code written in C, Java and other languages, if needed. > but I'd rather use python if push came to shove. What's the difference between Python and XSLT 2.0? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|