[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: versioning
> > ... Yet it turns out that > > XSLT 2.0 is not upto the task of converting from XSLT 1.0 to XSLT 2.0. > > The problem is that XSLT is not a true XML language: the XPath literals > are not broken up into a tree structure. So in order to transform XSLT 1.0 > it will be almost essential to delegate the XPath parse to some Java code. > Isn't it a problem XSLT 2.0 is designed to address through its string parsing and manipulation primitives? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|