[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: finding elements lowest in hierarchy?
At 2004-01-27 13:53 +0000, james walker wrote:
What happens if the hierarchy is alot bigger? Is it possible to use "descendent" to find if any of the lowest level descendents of a particular node contain a particular attribute? Sure ... review what I said earlier: To look anywhere below oneself, use ".//" ... to look for any element use "*" ... to filter only those elements that do not have any element, comment or PI children (i.e. lowest in the hierarchy), use the predicate "[not(node())]" and to check for a particular attribute existing use the predicate "[@minimum]". Just skip the predicate that qualifies the node as being at the bottom, and you end up with: test=".//*[@minimum]" as the boolean test of any elements with the attribute. Alternatively since all you are doing is testing you could just have: test=".//*/@minimum" to address the attributes, but the way you worded it you wanted to address the elements that have the attribute. How much reading of XPath have you done? I would recommend reading the specification or one of the many resources that can help you understand the composition of location path expressions. ......................... Ken
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Breast Cancer Awareness http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|