[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency
I am using JDK1.4 API for Transformation, which uses Xalan-Java internally. Is it a good idea using Extensions functions in Java language. I found myself very uncomfortable when I have complicated string processing in xsl. So, I am implementing those in Java language and calling them from XSLs. I also use Xalan's built in functions, like tokenize(), when ever available. Is that a bad practice? Does it add any performance hit? And is it bad memory-wise? Any suggestions would be appreciated! Thanks, Pramodh. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|