[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency

Subject: Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency
From: "Pramodh Peddi" <peddip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:16:58 -0500
its efficiency
I am using JDK1.4 API for Transformation, which uses Xalan-Java internally.

Is it a good idea using Extensions functions in Java language. I found
myself very uncomfortable when I have complicated string processing in xsl.
So, I am implementing those in Java language and calling them from XSLs.

I also use Xalan's built in functions, like tokenize(), when ever available.

Is that a bad practice? Does it add any performance hit? And is it bad
memory-wise?

Any suggestions would be appreciated!

Thanks,

Pramodh.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.