[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Getting a distinct list of node names
> > > node:definition/*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*))] > > > >Why should this take a long time? Isn't this the same as > > > >*[not(name() = name(preceding-sibling::*[last()]))] > > preceding-sibling::*[last()]), which therefore won't de-duplicate properly. > > So it won't take a long time, and it won't work either. But is there a way to express it as a single predicate? I mean, not equal to the name of any preceding-sibling? Just out of curiousity. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|