[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: literal result elements vs. <xsl:element>

Subject: Re: literal result elements vs. <xsl:element>
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:38:08 +0100
elements vs studio
The only time you need to use xsl:element is if you want to generate
the element name dynamically

you can go
<xsl:element name="{concat($foo,substring(.,2))}">....
but you can not go
<{concat($foo,substring(.,2))}> ...

The other use is as a way of avoiding namespace aliasing and generateing
elements in the xsl namespace


<xsl:element name="xsl:for-each">

generates an <xsl:for-each element but of course
 <xsl:for-each 
would be executed as xsl code.

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.